From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Thu Jan 19 2006 - 23:44:21 GMT-3
Yeah the authentication part is a very cool thought
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2281.html
If no authentication data is configured, the RECOMMENDED default
value is 0x63 0x69 0x73 0x63 0x6F 0x00 0x00 0x00.
What means this cisco?
:D
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Scott
Morris
Enviado el: jueves, 19 de enero de 2006 22:35
Para: RIDNEY_M_LAUDIANO.TTSP@ts.tsuneishi.co.jp; 'Jtheunissen';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: RE: VRRP vs Standby
Vrrp preempt IS indeed enabled by default, but you can change the delay if
you want.
Tracking was introduced in 12.3(2)T, so if you are on a 12.4 router, you
will have that functionality.
Otherwise, it's pretty similar. (No authentication by default, unlike HSRP)
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
RIDNEY_M_LAUDIANO.TTSP@ts.tsuneishi.co.jp
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 9:16 PM
To: Jtheunissen; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VRRP vs Standby
and a quick guess:
vrrp routers are configured to preempt by default and most importantly it
has no mechanism to track interfaces
"Jtheunissen" <jtheunissen@dodo.com.au> wrote on 01/20/2006 09:52:27 AM:
) Just a quick question what is the leading difference between VRRP and
) Standby options for fault tolerence ?.
) Jeff
) ________________________________________________
) Message sent using Dodo Internet Webmail Server
) _______________________________________________________________________
) Subscription information may be found at:
) http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3