From: Ronald Fugate (RFugate@amdocs.com)
Date: Wed Jan 18 2006 - 16:54:23 GMT-3
That's good information to know.
Thanks James; I will ask our AS rep about the sxf vs. sxd.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Ventre [mailto:messageboard@ventrefamily.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:51 PM
To: Ronald Fugate
Cc: joshua lauer; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: sso issues
I've seen no major issues with SSO on SXF. But I've heard from a number
of folks that the SXD train is far more stable. It was even recommended
to a customer of mine during a cisco audit. IIRC they were on SXE.
James
Ronald Fugate wrote:
> About 30 seconds delay on native.
>
> Cisco believes there is a hardware issue buried in here somewhere.
>
> I have 11 6500's (06's, 09's and 13's) I have to deploy this on next
> month
> And was hoping that they were right so I could just verify the
hardware.
>
> Just wanted to verify here if anyone has seen any issues to this.
>
> Can't afford to take any chances in production.
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,
protected from disclosure, and may be privileged.
The information is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s)
of the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3