From: Niche (jackyliu419@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 18 2006 - 06:19:28 GMT-3
Hi there,
Yes, that's how you should perform to deal with routing protocols
redistribution for Cisco IPv6.
My tip,
apply ISIS routing redistribution rule (redistribute connected w/
route-map) on IPv6 (general layer point of view) can speed up to build
a natural behavior when you deal with IPv6 redistribution requirement
in lab or real world. Try build up some complex IPv6 redistribution
cases and achieve full connectivity will help even more.
Best Regards,
Jacky
On 1/18/06, Edmundo Bodero <bodero.edmundo@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> When we redistribute one routing protocol into another in IPv4, the directly
> connected interfaces of the first protocol are automatically included in the
> redistribution (except for ISIS). I think this is called implicit
> redistribution rule. I have been playing with redistribution in IPv6
> (between OSPF and RIP both ways) and I think that this rule doesn't apply to
> IPv6. The only way to include the connected networks in the redistribution
> is to use the redistribute connected statement. Is that correct or Am I
> missing something?.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Edmundo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3