From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Tue Jan 17 2006 - 11:02:23 GMT-3
Yes, that would be correct, because when you redistribute the other
protocols, it is implying the redistribute connected command for the
interfaces included in the protocol. So, without the permit 20
statement, you would be breaking this implication and the directly
connected interfaces included in the redistribute would not be reachable
from the other routers within that protocol. The permit 20 statement
allows these implied connected routes to be passed into the protocol.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong on this one....as I do believe
that this is an important question and concept.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Quetta Walla
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 7:01 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IE v1 Lab 5. task 5.22 Redis bt rip-ospf
IE v1 Lab 5. task 5.22
When redistributing between RIP and OSPF on R4, R4 solution says:
router ospf 1
redistribute static subnets
redistribute rip subnets
redistribute connected subnets route-map connected-to-ospf
!
route-map connected-to-ospf per 10
match interface bri0/0
!
On the Ehternet 0/0 interface of R4 exists network 204.12.1.0 which is
speaking RIP with BB3. R4 is not redisdistributing this network in OSPF
because of the route-map connected-to-ospf
For it to work, another route-map statement has to be added.
route-map connected-to-ospf per 10
match interface bri0/0
!
route-map connected-to-ospf per 20
!
Or just add redistribute connected subnets under ospf 1.
Any comments.
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3