From: Brian (bluvmack@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 16 2006 - 13:41:25 GMT-3
I dont expect that, you have to figure the main goal is knowing your stuff.
Certification is a part of that, its the part most visible in your resume to
get you interviews. You can feel fairly confident that if you work hard at
your craft, network well (people), and stay sharp. There will always be a
demand for talented IT people.
----- Original Message -----
From: "CCIEin2006" <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com>
To: "Leigh Harrison" <ccileigh@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rick" <rick@iptool.net>; "Gustavo Novais" <gustavo.novais@novabase.pt>;
"Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: CCIE Numbers are Flying!
> In the 90's all companies were talking about were MCSE.
> By the time I got half way through my MCSE companies said there are too
> many
> MCSE's and they were looking for CCNA's.
> In 2001 I finished my CCNA and companies responded with "thats all you
> got?
> We're looking for CCNP's now."
> In 2004 I finished my CCNP and companies laughed at that. They told me a
> CCNP and a 25 cents will get you a pack of gum.
> In 2005 I saw some job ads were looking for CCIE's but only if your number
> was below 10,000. To humor those idiots I asked them why such a stringent
> requirement, they said it was because the CCIE exam has gotten easier to
> pass and the newer candidates are not as knowledgeable as the older
> CCIE's.
>
> I just hope cisco doesn't fade away like Novell did...
>
>
> On 1/16/06, Leigh Harrison <ccileigh@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I passed on 7th November 2005 and am #15331, Anthony Squeira passed on
>> 5th Jan 2006 and is #15626. That was nearly 300 in just under 2 months
>> and that includes christmas break!!
>>
>> Is there a chance of a ccie becoming common ?
>>
>> LH
>>
>> Rick wrote:
>>
>> >I am #14319 and I passed on Jan. 5, 2005. That is basically 3.5 IE's per
>> day
>> >for the year 2005.
>> >11 days in 2006 = 3.5 IE's per day. I think 2006 will be very close to
>> >2005, just my opinion.
>> >
>> >just thought it would be a change of pace to post this for fun
>> >
>> >Rick
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Gustavo Novais" <gustavo.novais@novabase.pt>
>> >To: "CCIEin2006" <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com>; "Cisco certification"
>> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:30 AM
>> >Subject: RE: CCIE Numbers are Flying!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>Hi,
>> >>As long as I can tell, I was the first on groupstudy this year (not on
>> >>Cisco, I asked the proctor!) and I was 15622... We've been receiving
>> >>word of #15661... so in 11 days (counting weekend!) we've had 39
>> >>CCIE's!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Gustavo Novais
>> >>
>> >>Cisco CCIE #15622 (R&S-----Original Message-----
>> >>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> >>CCIEin2006
>> >>Sent: segunda-feira, 16 de Janeiro de 2006 15:23
>> >>To: Cisco certification
>> >>Subject: CCIE Numbers are Flying!
>> >>
>> >>Is it just me or are CCIE's passing at a faster rate with the new exam
>> >>format than the old exam format?
>> >>Am I just imagining things?
>> >>
>> >>One of my goals was to get a CCIE number below 16000 but it looks like
>> >>by May we will be well beyond that.
>> >>
>> >>What do you think the monthly average of new CCIE's is?
>> >>
>> >>_______________________________________________________________________
>> >>Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>_______________________________________________________________________
>> >>Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________________________________
>> >Subscription information may be found at:
>> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3