From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sun Jan 15 2006 - 15:19:52 GMT-3
Great idea! That way we don't have to trust the programmers being
consistent! ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Lewis
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:50 AM
To: InderpalS@mindscapeit.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Bandwidth on interface
I strongly recommend people use the show policy-map interface output under
all circumstances to check the actual bandwidth that will be applied by the
configuration. The way the bandwidth percent and bandwidth percent
remaining commands calculate things has changed at least once, and may
change again. Rather than trying to memorize things like this, it is always
better to rely on verification via show commands.
Chris
On 1/15/06, InderpalS@mindscapeit.com <InderpalS@mindscapeit.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
>
>
> When using CBWFQ, it is necessary to set interface bandwidth?
>
>
>
> Scenario 1---------> I guarantee bandwidth for a class using Bandwidth
> ( )kbps command in policy map
>
>
>
> Policy-map policy1
>
> Class class1
>
> Bandwidth 256
>
>
>
> If we still need to set bandwidth on interface then why since we are
> giving guaranteed bandwidth value in policy map.
>
>
>
> Scenario 2---------> I reserve bandwidth for a class using bandwidth
> percent command in policy map
>
>
>
> Policy-map policy1
>
> Class class1
>
> Bandwidth percent 25
>
>
>
> I understand in this scenario, interface bandwidth needs to be set so
> that router can calculate available bandwidth and assign to class.
>
>
>
>
>
> Any inputs are appreciated!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Inder
>
> 1/15/2006 10:55:46 AM
>
> Disclaimer
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3