Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500

From: James Ventre (messageboard@ventrefamily.com)
Date: Wed Jan 11 2006 - 18:49:48 GMT-3

• Next message: Michael Brooks: "Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Previous message: Michael Brooks: "Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Maybe in reply to: CCIEin2006: "Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Next in thread: Michael Brooks: "Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I've got plenty of routed links with STP explicitally disabled and the
autostate still works.

James

Michael Brooks wrote:
> Whether a vlan interface is up or down is dependent on whether spanning-tree
> is forwarding on that vlan. If spanning-tree is not forwarding on the vlan
> it will be down/down.
>
> Mike

• Next message: Michael Brooks: "Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Previous message: Michael Brooks: "Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Maybe in reply to: CCIEin2006: "Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Next in thread: Michael Brooks: "Re: Switched Virtual Interfaces on Cat3550 vs Cat6500"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:48 GMT-3