From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Wed Jan 04 2006 - 12:46:07 GMT-3
Yes, I just tested this.....you will only send the summarization when
there is a network that falls into the summary. Otherwise, the summary
route is not sent.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: lim es [mailto:tiga72@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:01 AM
To: Schulz, Dave
Subject: RE: network statement(fr the more specific) needed for eigrp
summariztion?
Hi Dave,
Thanks again, heres the scenario i have come out with,
still doesnt work until i include the networks
intented for summarization.
[r1]----------------[r2]
a b
a: 12.0.0.1 /24
b: 12.0.0.2 /24
====r1 =====
int e0
ip add 12.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip summary-address eigrp 1 10.0.0.0 255.255.252.0
exit
int lo0
10.0.0.1 /24
int lo1
10.0.1.1 /24
int lo2
10.0.2.1 /24
int lo3
10.0.3.1 /24
exit
router eigrp 1
no auto-sum
network 12.0.0.1 0.0.0.0
end
====r2 =====
int e0
ip add 12.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
router eigrp 1
no auto-sum
network 12.0.0.2 0.0.0.0
end
--- "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
> Lim - Can you send a copy of your configuration?
>
>
> Dave Schulz,
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> lim es
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:03 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: network statement(fr the more specific)
> needed for eigrp
> summariztion?
>
> Hi Group,
>
> Back to the same topic, i found that eigrp
> summarization can only work when the more specific
> networks are included/added to the network comand
> (in
> the router eigrp).tested it in a lab
>
> Having the more specific networks just in the
> routing
> cannot make it advertise the summarized network.
>
> I am not sure if i am interpreting it correctly?
>
> TIA
>
> Lim
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:47 GMT-3