From: CCIEin2006 (ciscocciein2006@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 29 2005 - 13:51:52 GMT-3
So even if R3 is not a client of R4, just the fact that R4 is a RR will
cause it to forward the IBGP update?
On 12/28/05, Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
> To answer your own question, think about how BGP works:
>
> If you are a router in AS200 and you receive an iBGP update, would you
> forward that update onto another router in AS200 if you aren't
> configured as a RR?
>
> So now that we know R4 will not forward the iBGP update on we can solve
> this by configuring R4 as a RR or have R3 peer with R5 directly.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> CCIEin2006
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:07 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Route Reflector Question
>
> Hello All,
>
> Could someone tell me how many times a route will be propagated in the
> following example:
>
> R1(AS100)--->R2(AS200)---->R3(AS200 RR)---->R4(AS200)---->R5(AS200)
>
> R1 is in AS100, all others are in AS200.
> R3 is configured as route reflector with R4 as the route reflector
> client.
>
> Basically I'm wondering if R4 will propagate the routes learned from R3
> to
> R5?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:52 GMT-3