From: lim es (tiga72@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Dec 29 2005 - 12:41:39 GMT-3
Thanks guys, its like midnight here. I try the
suggestions tomorrow.
but since eigrp nei is up, authentication might not be
the cause
yes, i mean to only let serial 0 run eigrp1.
hmm....that shouldnt be the cause too.
Anyway..i'll give a try, let u guys know.
Thanks again:)
Lim
--- Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>
wrote:
> Dave, Has any sense to send eigrp packets via the
> Loopbacks that covers that
> range?
>
> :D
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
> Schulz, Dave
> Enviado el: jueves, 29 de diciembre de 2005 11:25
> Para: lim es; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Asunto: RE: eigrp summarization
>
> Lim - Did you mean to include only the Serial 0 in
> the routing process?
> You may want to try this again with taking out the
> authentication and
> using:
>
> router eigrp 1
> network 140.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
> no auto-summary
>
> Dave Schulz,
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lim es [mailto:tiga72@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:40 AM
> To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: eigrp summarization
>
>
> Thanks Dave,
>
> Here it is:
>
> (neighbors are up)
>
> R9#sh run int s0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 229 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 140.10.69.2 255.255.255.252
> ip authentication mode eigrp 1 md5
> ip authentication key-chain eigrp 1 new
> ip summary-address eigrp 1 140.10.8.0 255.255.252.0
> 5
> clockrate 64000
> no fair-queue
> end
>
> R9#b
> Interface IP-Address OK?
> Method
> Status Protocol
> Ethernet0 140.10.9.9 YES NVRAM
>
> up up
> Loopback0 100.0.0.9 YES NVRAM
>
> up up
> Loopback1 140.10.8.9 YES
> manual
> up up
> Loopback2 140.10.10.9 YES
> manual
> up up
> Loopback3 140.10.11.9 YES
> manual
> up up
> Serial0 140.10.69.2 YES NVRAM
>
> up up
> Serial1 unassigned YES NVRAM
>
> administratively down down
> Virtual-Access1 unassigned YES unset
>
> up up
> R9#r
> router eigrp 1
> network 140.10.69.2 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> !
>
> --- "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
>
> > Lim - Can you send over your config? Your
> > summarization should work as
> > long as it matches what is configured.
> >
> >
> > Dave Schulz,
> > Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > lim es
> > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:27 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: eigrp summarization
> >
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > Got a simple question about the topic.
> >
> > eigrp does not require the less specific routes
> > inside
> > the network statement (in router eigrp) but just
> an
> > existence of the targeted less-sepcific routes to
> be
> > in the routing table for it to work.
> >
> > strangely, it does not advertise the summary until
> i
> > add any of the less specific routes in the
> "network"
> > command.
> >
> > am i missing something??
> >
> > Appreciate any advice on this
> >
> > Lim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> > http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:52 GMT-3