From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Dec 21 2005 - 13:26:09 GMT-3
Yes, you can do this with an "ip nat inside destination"
translation. Look at the TCP Load Balancing feature of NAT for the
config.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Harri Makela
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:32 AM
> To: Nawaz, Ajaz; 'Church, Chuck'; Mohamed.N; Sharifi, Reza; Guyler,
Rik;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Static Translation !
>
> Hi Group,
>
> Can we define static translation for port ranges instead iof a
> particular port ? i.e.
>
> access-list out-in permit tcp any host x.x.x.x range 2000 4000 -
Need to
> sort out that how to define static translation againt this particular
> access-list ?
>
> access-list out-in permit tcp any host x.x.x.x range 10240 13120 -
Need
> to sort out that how to define static translation againt this
particular
> access-list ?
>
> access-list out-in permit tcp any host x.x.x.x eq smtp - OK
> static (inside, outside) tcp x.x.x.x smtp x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x 0
0 -
> Ok
>
> Any Advice will be highly appreciated.
>
> Many Thanks
> Harri
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:51 GMT-3