RE: callmanager call delay

From: Erick Bergquist (ebergquist@ameritech.net)
Date: Tue Dec 13 2005 - 03:39:37 GMT-3


You can use the Dialed Number Analyzer (DNA) tool to
see what other matches are being hit, to help isolate
the problem.

The CCM Detailed traces will also show whats going on.

--- "HIERS, DAVID (AIT)" <dh4578@sbc.com> wrote:

> Best guesses are:
>
> 1. There is a non-@ pattern somewhere
> 2. The 7 digit number being dialed is not a member
> of the NANP
> 3. The NANP file has been hacked
>
>
>
> David Hiers
>
> CCIE 10734, CISSP
> Systems Engineer
> AT&T AESE
>
> -###-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> supernet
> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 9:09 PM
> To: HIERS, DAVID (AIT); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: callmanager call delay
>
>
> Thank you! Any idea what could be wrong?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> HIERS, DAVID (AIT)
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 9:50 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: callmanager call delay
>
> The @ symbol is supposed to provide instant call
> completion for 7 digit
> numbers.
>
>
http://www.ciscotaccc.com/voice/showcase?case=K32575150
> Cisco CallManager installations in North America are
> able to use the @ macro
> in the route patterns to allow the use of variable
> length dial plans. If a
> caller dials a seven digit local number, or a ten or
> eleven digit long
> distance number, the call is sent out to the Public
> Switched Telephone
> Network (PSTN) immediately after the last digit is
> dialed.
>
> Maybe something else is going on...
>
> David Hiers
>
> CCIE 10734, CISSP
> Systems Engineer
> AT&T AESE
>
> -###-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Scott, Tyson C
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 6:10 AM
> To: Chris Cole; supernet; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: callmanager call delay
>
>
> Two things. You can adjust the interdigit timeout
> following this
> example.
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_tech_note0
> 9186a00800dab26.shtml
>
> Or you can press # after dialing the number and that
> will cause the
> system to stop waiting for digits and forward the
> call.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tyson Scott
> CCIE # 13513
> Network Engineer
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Cole
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 7:59 AM
> To: supernet; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: callmanager call delay
>
> Create a better match like 9.456XXXX or
> 9.408[2-9]XXXXXX then point it
> either to the Route list or gateway..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> supernet
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:39 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: callmanager call delay
>
> I have a CallManager 4.0.1. I created a route patter
> 9.@ using NANP.
> When I
> dial a local number 456-7890, there is a 10-second
> delay before
> CallManager sending it to the gateway. However, if I
> dial long distance
> number 1-408-456-7890, CallManager send the call
> immediately. I know the
> 10-second delay can be changed system-wise but I
> want to keep it. Is
> there any way to have CallManager send calls to
> gateway immediately for
> local number?
> Thank
> you, Yoshi
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:51 GMT-3