From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sat Dec 10 2005 - 13:39:46 GMT-3
Cham -
I believe that everything is working as it should with your R8 RP....as it is
allowing the 229 group and filtering the 228 from this specific RP. Are you
expecting a different result?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: Cisco certification
Sent: 12/10/2005 8:35 AM
Subject: RE: rp-announce-filter
Hi group,
Just looking for some clarification on the ip pim rp-announce-filter
command.
R8-----------R10-------------R9
R8
ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list 20
!
access-list 20 permit 228.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
access-list 20 permit 229.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
R10
ip pim send-rp-discovery Loopback0 scope 16
ip pim rp-announce-filter rp-list R9_as_RP_only group-list 20
ip pim rp-announce-filter rp-list R8_as_RP_only group-list 30
!
!
ip access-list standard R8_as_RP_only
permit 150.1.8.8
ip access-list standard R9_as_RP_only
permit 150.1.9.9
access-list 20 permit 225.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
access-list 20 permit 226.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
access-list 30 permit 229.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
R9
ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list 10
!
access-list 10 permit 225.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
access-list 10 permit 226.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
I also have sparse-dense-mode on all ints and loopbacks. When R9 is
requesting to be the RP for groups in ACL 10 and R10 is permitting R9
as the RP for the groups for ACL 20 this works fine as I expected.
My understanding is that if the RP is not requesting the same as what
the MA is filtering the MA will discard all requests from the RP? By
the "same" I mean nothing more - nothing less?? What I see is that R8
is requesting to be the RP for groups in ACL 20 and the MA permitting
R8 to be the RP for only some of the groups it is asking for?
What I then see is the MA accepting this and just filtering the
228.0.0.0/8 group as this is no permitted within the R10s ACL30 I
thought that this should not happen R10 should drop all requests from
R8 as they do not match with what it is filtering?? I am trying to
understand IE lab 5 tasks 7.1.-7.6?
*Dec 10 13:23:05.295: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from
150.1.8.8, RP_cnt 1, ht 181
*Dec 10 13:23:05.295: Auto-RP(0): Filtered 228.0.0.0/8 for RP 150.1.8.8
*Dec 10 13:23:05.295: Auto-RP(0): Update (229.0.0.0/8, RP:150.1.8.8),
PIMv2 v1
*Dec 10 13:23:05.295: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from
150.1.8.8, RP_cnt 1, ht 181
*Dec 10 13:23:05.295: Auto-RP(0): Filtered 228.0.0.0/8 for RP 150.1.8.8
*Dec 10 13:23:05.295: Auto-RP(0): Update (229.0.0.0/8, RP:150.1.8.8),
PIMv2 v1
R10#sh ip pim
*Dec 10 13:23:11.739: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from
150.1.9.9, RP_cnt 1, ht 181
*Dec 10 13:23:11.739: Auto-RP(0): Update (225.0.0.0/8, RP:150.1.9.9),
PIMv2 v1
*Dec 10 13:23:11.739: Auto-RP(0): Update (226.0.0.0/8, RP:150.1.9.9),
PIMv2 v1
*Dec 10 13:23:11.739: Auto-RP(0): Received RP-announce, from
150.1.9.9, RP_cnt 1, ht 181
*Dec 10 13:23:11.739: Auto-RP(0): Update (225.0.0.0/8, RP:150.1.9.9),
PIMv2 v1
*Dec 10 13:23:11.739: Auto-RP(0): Update (226.0.0.0/8, RP:150.1.9.9),
PIMv2 v1
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP(0): Build RP-Discovery packet
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP: Build mapping (225.0.0.0/8,
RP:150.1.9.9), PIMv2 v1,
R10#sh ip pim r
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP: Build mapping (226.0.0.0/8,
RP:150.1.9.9), PIMv2 v1.
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP: Build mapping (229.0.0.0/8,
RP:150.1.8.8), PIMv2 v1.
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP(0): Send RP-discovery packet on
GigabitEthernet4/0/0 (2 RP entries)
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP(0): Send RP-discovery packet on
FastEthernet0/0/0 (2 RP entries)
*Dec 10 13:23:12.463: Auto-RP: Send RP-discovery packet on Loopback0
(2 RP entries)
Thanks,
Cham
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3