From: Nadeem Zahid \(iszahid\) (iszahid@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Dec 06 2005 - 03:15:07 GMT-3
Lab 7 BGP task 6.7-6.10
1. Solution uses this method:
router bgp 100
neighbor 54.1.7.254 route-map BB1 in
neighbor 204.12.1.254 route-map BB3 in
!
ip as-path access-list 54 permit _54$
!
route-map BB1 permit 10
match as-path 54
set local-preference 200
!
route-map BB1 permit 20
!
route-map BB3 permit 10
match as-path 54
!
route-map BB3 permit 20
set local-preference 200
Whereas I use this method:
router bgp 100
neighbor 54.1.7.254 route-map AS54 in
neighbor 204.12.1.254 route-map AS54_CUSTOMER in
!
ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^54$
ip as-path access-list 2 permit _54$
!
route-map AS54 permit 10
match as-path 1
set local-preference 200
!
route-map AS54 permit 20
!
route-map AS54_CUSTOMER permit 10
match as-path 2
set local-preference 200
!
route-map AS54_CUSTOMER permit 20
Just wondering if that is ok?
2. Task 6.12:
When ths question aks that make sure we have *reachability* to the BGP
prefixes,
what does that mean in the lab? Does that mean that they are in BGP
table and "one way" traffic
can be sent" or does that mean they must be pingable?
3. QOS: Task 9.1-9.5
I don't know how the address of voice-gateway was determined in the ACL
as 220.20.3.192?
It's not known anywhere.
Task: 9.6-9.9
It is understandable that Bc = 7680 for min 10mSec Tc.
Can someone explain how the Bc for R3 came out to be 48384?
thnx
Nadeem
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3