From: Josef A (josefnet@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 01:46:45 GMT-3
I do not want to remove the local-preference on R6. I am trying to force R3
to change the next-hop for those routes without using WEIGHT, and without
removing the local-preference on R6.
Thanks and Regards.
Josef.
On 11/30/05, rosy bird <rosybird@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just remove the local preference on R6,by default R6 and R3 should learn
> the routes from their directly connected EBGP peers.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On 12/1/05, Josef A <josefnet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Guys:
> >
> > Here is a question on bgp next-hop modification.
> >
> > I have a topology like this:
> >
> >
> > BB3 ------------------ R3
> > |
> > |
> > R5
> > |
> > |
> > BB1------------------- R6
> >
> >
> > BB1 and BB3 are both in AS54.
> >
> > R3, R5, and R6 are in AS 100.
> >
> > AS 100 is learning some prefixes from AS54. I have initially set the
> > local
> > preference inbound on R6 so that AS100 will prefer the R6-BB1 link to
> > reach
> > those prefixes from AS54.
> >
> > Thus R3 is now using BB1 as its next-hop for those prefixes.
> >
> > My goal now is to override that behavior on R3, and force R3 to make BB3
> > the
> > next-hop for those prefixes, without using WEIGHT. I have tried using a
> > route-map inbound on R3 matching those prefixes and using the set ip
> > next-hop A.B.C.D or the set ip next-hop peer-address command . But this
> > is
> > not working.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > Your thoughts and/or comments is appreciated
> >
> > Josef.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:49 GMT-3