From: Anthony Sequeira (terry.francona@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 10:53:53 GMT-3
Flapping would not be acceptable in the lab - if you are flapping - you can
bet you lost some points somewhere.
Please note - since dialer watch does not depend on interesting traffic -
ISDN would be "nailed up" regardless of the lack of interesting traffic.
I think in the lab you are always going to find a solution that stays within
the constraints of the task. This is just how it is in an InternetworkExpert
lab.
So Nadeem - this practice lab has just taught you something very valuable
about dial - one of the major decisions you might have to make in production
and in the lab is - what type of backup solution should I implement? Notice
that your interesting traffic definition will help answer that question!!!!!
On 11/30/05, Nadeem Zahid (iszahid) <iszahid@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Anthony.
> But let say if I don't do *any* additional config then after dialer-watch,
> BRI will keep flapping.(unless
> I add dialer idle timeout 0) Will that flapping be acceptable in the lab?
>
> Nadeem
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Anthony Sequeira [mailto:terry.francona@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2005 8:59 PM
> *To:* Nadeem Zahid (iszahid)
> *Cc:* ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: IE Lab 6 Sec 5.8
>
>
> Personally - I would NEVER do more than what is asked in a case like
> this.
>
> I have this situation cause a BELL to RING in my head. What would Cisco be
> looking for in a case like this? Certainly they do not want me going and
> "breaking the rules" of interesting traffic here - they must be testing my
> knowledge of the BACKUP METHODS.
>
> Specifically - this drills in on the issue of which backup methods care
> about interesting traffic definitions.
>
> For example - DIALER WATCH could care less what is interesting! BACKUP
> INTERFACE however, does care very much still about interesting traffic.
>
> As we practice for the lab - we should get better and better at spotting
> these issues involving the technologies.
>
>
> On 11/29/05, Nadeem Zahid (iszahid) <iszahid@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > This section asks to configure OSPF on ISDN but previously in the ISDN
> > section we only allowed
> > ICMP as the interesting traffic. Does the task implictly requires that
> > OSPF or IP be added as
> > interesting traffic or should not do more than what is asked?
> >
> > Nadeem
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:08 GMT-3