Re: Per Port Per Vlan..

From: Chris Lewis (chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Nov 29 2005 - 18:05:01 GMT-3

• Next message: Eddie Parra: "Re: FREEK and FRTS on the same interface ?"
• Previous message: Leigh Nash: "RE: Internetworkexpert Workbook Order"
• Maybe in reply to: Venkataramanaiah.R: "Per Port Per Vlan.."
• Next in thread: HIERS, DAVID \(AIT\): "RE: Per Port Per Vlan.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

It is perfectly reasonable to configure parent/child class maps for an access port, something like shaping the output to an overall rate, then providing differentiated guarantees for different traffic types within that shaped rate.
   
  Per port per vlan configurations are applied on trunk ports, not access ports.

"Venkataramanaiah.R" <vramanaiah@gmail.com> wrote:
  Hi,

i would like to know whether it makes any sense to configure the
parent/child class maps for an access port, if we want to just
classify some traffic on the given access port.

My understanding is that per port/per vlan applies only to the trunk
ports.. Correct me if i am wrong.

Regards
-Venkat

• Next message: Eddie Parra: "Re: FREEK and FRTS on the same interface ?"
• Previous message: Leigh Nash: "RE: Internetworkexpert Workbook Order"
• Maybe in reply to: Venkataramanaiah.R: "Per Port Per Vlan.."
• Next in thread: HIERS, DAVID \(AIT\): "RE: Per Port Per Vlan.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:08 GMT-3