From: Nadeem Zahid \(iszahid\) (iszahid@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Nov 29 2005 - 03:39:16 GMT-3
Thanks, but aren't you checking just the connectivity to the addresses
in your topo
and not those learned from the BB? I'm not even sure if that is a
requirement.
Regs
Nadeem
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 10:20 PM
To: Nadeem Zahid (iszahid)
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Did not passed the Lab
Sure
tclsh
foreach addr {
IPAdd1 <= Taken from show ip alias in all the routers IPAddn } {ping
$addr}
HTH
Victor
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Nadeem Zahid (iszahid) [mailto:iszahid@cisco.com] Enviado el:
martes, 29 de noviembre de 2005 1:46
Para: CCIEin2006; Victor Cappuccio
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: RE: Did not passed the Lab
Would you like to share how you use this script to check the
connectivity and what The script looks like?
Regs
Nadeem
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
CCIEin2006
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:36 PM
To: Victor Cappuccio
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Did not passed the Lab
Hello Victor,
I am sorry to hear the bad news. But judging by your posts I can tell
you know your stuff. Actually to hear you failed is making me think I
should push back my lab date.
One question though...are you saying the TCL scripts incorrectly showed
you have full connectivity when in fact you did not?
On 11/28/05, Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Hola a todos..
>
>
>
> Lamentably did not passed the Lab last Monday, I felt defeated, after
> 1 year of speeding nights without sleeping, getting separated from my
> wife, and almost a heat attack I did not pass, this makes me feel like
> a peace of sh..t, but now looking at my 2 little kids eyes, and this
> poor country that I live with all this f$%& political and economy
> problem I'm more motivated to continue and leave this hole but with my
> #.
>
>
>
> In a personal note: This Time I will only follow IEWB. The real labs
> questions were very (x 1000) close to several labs that IE has in
> their excellent WB, but the only problem is that I had the IEWB just 2
> weeks and half before my lab date and I did not had time to understand
> how stuff really work because the various mistakes of the old WB where
> my studies begun, and also because the overwhelming work (700$ paid
> 24x7x365) that I have, I just rushed up the IE labs thinking in a
> miracle with out understanding critical points. Now this time I would
> master on all topics since I do not know what my friends doing now.
>
>
>
> Personal Advice: Read the whole Lab and try to understand what they
> are asking. There are many pitfalls for example maybe you are doing
> your wildcard correct to the question and you are seeing the "You
think"
> correct
> routes are in the RTable, but It could happen that is not for the
> previous question networks, it's for the "ALL" the networks, also read
> the Brains Explanations in the regular expression in BGP, and master
> them, they could appear in your lab and not only the _AS$ like in my
Deprecated WB I had.
>
>
>
> The only thing that make me think (S: YES I THINK A LOT, Because your
> WB did not make sense for me - and also that you should have your
> solutions double checked, and stop the selling of your WB until they
> are fixed or at least have support for question posted in the site) is
> that I executed the TCL Script like 6 times in my lab and It was
> working correctly, I reloaded all the routers like 4 times to test the
> backup ISDN, VL, confreg configuration and it was working very fine.
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your previous help and now I'm going to
> prepare more seriously for next year!
>
>
>
> Peace and God Bless
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:08 GMT-3