RE: STP dilema

From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sat Nov 19 2005 - 01:14:12 GMT-3

• Next message: blodwick: "Jan 1, 2006 alot goes away, but what gets added?"
• Previous message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: MPLS VPN PE-CE encapsulation"
• Maybe in reply to: Hooman Parta: "STP dilema"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hooman -

We have to not confuse VTP with the operation of spanning tree. Vtp is the
protocol that allows vlan information to be dispersed to various switches set
up as clients. Even though the switches are in transparent mode, they will
still participate in the whatever spanning tree operation is configured.
Please someone correct me if any of this is off.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 11/18/2005 5:10 PM
Subject: STP dilema

Hi,

If we can not pass the VLAN > 1005 to other switches, what is the use
for it
by using RSTP? We have to be on transparent mode, so we can not use any
VTP
features for the upper VLAN ranges.

It is good just for running couple of switches not a big network which
STP
designed for.

Any comment?

Thanks,
Hooman Parta

• Next message: blodwick: "Jan 1, 2006 alot goes away, but what gets added?"
• Previous message: Andrew Lissitz \(alissitz\): "RE: MPLS VPN PE-CE encapsulation"
• Maybe in reply to: Hooman Parta: "STP dilema"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3