From: John Matus (John.Matus@tokiom.com)
Date: Thu Nov 17 2005 - 17:15:23 GMT-3
that's a gotcha
Regards,
John D. Matus
Technical Support / PAS
Fujitsu Consulting
626-568-7716
John.Matus@tokiom.com
"Scott Morris"
<swm@emanon.com>
Sent by: To
nobody@groupstudy "'Guyler, Rik'"
.com <rguyler@shp-dayton.org>,
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc
11/17/2005 11:39
AM Subject
RE: One minute question
Please respond to
"Scott Morris"
<swm@emanon.com>
Being that the seconds are included, 16:59 will go to and include 16:59:59.
AT 5pm, it changes thus providing "till" then.
In short, ask the proctor!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Guyler, Rik
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:32 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: One minute question
Since the technical details of the config would not be revealed by the
answer to this question, I see no problem with asking the proctor. That
said, I would tend towards the latter option. Since 5:00PM is 1700 hours,
"till 5:00PM" = "till 1700" so I go with periodic weekdays 8:00 to 17:00.
My .02
Rik
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo Novais [mailto:gustavo.novais@novabase.pt]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:11 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: One minute question
Hi,
A dumb interpretation issue...
If we are told to allow access on weekdays to a server from 8 AM till 5PM,
what would you configure?
Time-range TIMEACL
Periodic weekdays 8:00 to 16:59 or periodic weekdays 8:00 to 17:00
Access-list 100 permit ip any host 1.1.1.1 time-range TIMEACL
On IPexpert workbooks they tend to the first, on IEWB they tend to the
latter. Is the last minute included or excluded of the time range?
Would missing a minute make you lose points on the lab? I think of no way
of
asking this to the proctor without receiving a "What do you think?" answer
Gustavo Novais
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3