RE: 3550 qos

From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 17 2005 - 15:08:30 GMT-3

• Next message: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: Feedback on 6500 conversion doc"
• Previous message: Big guy: "3550 qos"
• Maybe in reply to: Big guy: "3550 qos"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

IP Precedence is a layer 3 marking, cos is a layer 2 marking, so no they are
not the same thing.

Without checking my syntax you can set the cos value a number of ways, an
ACL is one.

HTH

Lee.

-----Original Message-----
From: Big guy [mailto:jenseike@start.no]
Sent: 17 November 2005 17:55
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: 3550 qos

Hi group...

If I only want to allow traffic from an server only allowing traffic with
cos 0 marked packets... Will setting this in a acl using prec 0 do it, or do
I need to use mac acl setting this with cos 0... Will both method be right?

• Next message: Nawaz, Ajaz: "RE: Feedback on 6500 conversion doc"
• Previous message: Big guy: "3550 qos"
• Maybe in reply to: Big guy: "3550 qos"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:07 GMT-3