From: Montiean (noktes@bellsouth.net)
Date: Fri Nov 11 2005 - 21:17:16 GMT-3
Thanks everyone!! It is really clear my head now. :)
Montiean
>
> From: John Matus <John.Matus@tokiom.com>
> Date: 2005/11/11 Fri PM 06:56:28 EST
> To: "Montiean" <noktes@bellsouth.net>
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com, nobody@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: dialer-group under BRI interface
>
> monty,
> in IE's manual they state that you can prevent a router from dialing by
> leaving off the dialer string at the end of the dialer-map statement.
> however, whenever i did this i was not able to ping from on side to the
> other.....i could only get layer 2 to come up if there was the
> dialer-string on both sides. t
> the easiest way to prevent a router from dialing isdn is to make all
> traffic uninteresting by not defining a dialer-group. very simple, very
> effective.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> Technical Support / PAS
> Fujitsu Consulting
> 626-568-7716
> John.Matus@tokiom.com
>
>
>
> "Montiean"
> <noktes@bellsouth
> .net> To
> Sent by: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> nobody@groupstudy cc
> .com
> Subject
> dialer-group under BRI interface
> 11/11/2005 09:49
> AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> "Montiean"
> <noktes@bellsouth
> .net>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Folks,
> Let say the question asking only one side to initiate the call so on
> other site will just configure "dialer map" without remote isdn calling
> number. This would be enough not to let the router call out.
> However, in some solution guide from lab workbook use additional command
>
> like " dialer-group" on the side that doesnot need to initiate the call. As
>
> I know, dialer-group will use to screen the traffic to initiate the call. I
>
> am not sure why we still need it as above scenario.
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Montiean
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3