Fwd: FW: SV: fram-de bit

From: Sanjay Barthakur (sanjay@antscorp.com)
Date: Thu Nov 10 2005 - 12:21:05 GMT-3

Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Sparse-dense mode example on frame - AutoRP"
Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Yes, it is possible even on your first try..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear Paul,

Could you please un-scrible me from this mailing list
as I no longer need this.

Please let me know when you will be back in VA and we
can have lunch/dinner.

Thanks
Sanjay
(703) 395-2601
Note: forwarded message attached.
X-Apparently-To: sanjay@antscorp.com via 68.142.201.37; Thu, 10 Nov 2005
  07:12:56 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [192.254.30.2]
Authentication-Results: mta107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com from=gtsi.com;
  domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 192.254.30.2 (EHLO pandora.gtsi.com) (192.254.30.2) by
  mta107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:12:56
  -0800
Received: from audi.corp.gtsi.com (audi.corp.gtsi.com [192.254.18.236])
  by pandora.gtsi.com (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAAFEvgH021309
  for <sanjay@antscorp.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:14:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from INFINITI.corp.gtsi.com ([192.254.18.151]) by
  audi.corp.gtsi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 10 Nov
  2005 10:13:10 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: FW: SV: fram-de bit
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:13:09 -0500
Thread-Topic: SV: fram-de bit
Thread-Index: AcXl5zNAZ25JI0qrTRSCAgesdokgbgAIQlnAAAA3jyA=
From: "Steve Ferry" <Steve.Ferry@gtsi.com>
To: "Sanjay Barthakur" <sanjay@antscorp.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2005 15:13:10.0177 (UTC)
  FILETIME=[42EBC910:01C5E609]
Content-Length: 1988

Hi,

Can you please do me a HUGE favor and send an email to
ccielab@groupstudy.com and have them route the forum
stuff to you instead? These things are KILLING my Inbox.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
JP
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 10:06 AM
To: 'Nawaz, Ajaz'; 'manoj menon'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SV: SV: fram-de bit

Man... I did not understand squat of what you tried to say here...

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Nawaz, Ajaz [mailto:Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com]
Sendt: 10. november 2005 12:09
Til: 'manoj menon'; JP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Emne: RE: SV: fram-de bit

Option 1 DE List

Option 2 Set action in policy map

Option 3 Police action

Three choices. Imho the one to opt for would be the least command
intensive
if the requirement is simply to set the de bit. Keep it simple - that's
the
consensus right?

Ajaz Nawaz

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
manoj menon
Sent: 10 November 2005 09:08
To: JP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: SV: fram-de bit

JP, Yes thats what I would do......to me..its more scalable...hope you
agree!

JP <jenseike@start.no> wrote:v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}o\:*
{behavior:url(#default#VML);}w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}.shape
{behavior:url(#default#VML);}
So you mean that I should do it like this :

class-map match-all fr-de

match access-group 199

policy-map FR-DE

class fr-de

set fr-de

interface Serial0/0

ip address 7.7.12.2 255.255.255.0

encapsulation frame-relay

ip ospf network point-to-multipoint

no fair-queue

frame-relay class FR-DE

frame-relay traffic-shaping

frame-relay map ip 7.7.12.3 203 broadcast

frame-relay map ip 7.7.12.5 205 broadcast

frame-relay map ip 7.7.12.6 206 broadcast

no frame-relay inverse-arp

frame-relay lmi-type ansi

map-class frame-relay FR-DE

service-policy output FR-DE

Jens P

---------------------------------

Fra: manoj menon [mailto:manojmenon123@yahoo.com]
Sendt: 10. november 2005 09:41
Til: JP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Emne: Re: fram-de bit

hello Jens,

Shall we call the first way a 'legacy' way of doing and second one is
'advanced' or 'modular' way of doing it !!

So In the exam, i would tempt to use the latter one (unless they
specifically ask us to use FR-DE or NOT TO USE MQC)

(I have a comment on the way you applied it to the interface, i shall
create
a map-class put the service-poliy under the map-class and then put it
there
(if no restrictions on any of these, again)

comments please.

Regards,

manoj

JP <jenseike@start.no> wrote:

Hi group.

I am trying to sett he fr-de bit

Will this two command do the exact same thing, is there any situations
one
way are the right way than the other? :

frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip list 199

interface s0/0

frame-relay de-group 1 203

frame-relay de-group 1 205

frame-relay de-group 1 206