From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 22:06:31 GMT-3
And that would be another method. But VLAN hopping and auto-trunking aren't
a switch vulnerability in my opinion. They are an administrative or design
vulnerability.
If you continually leave your front door unlocked and standing open, whose
fault is it when you get robbed? The door is inherently designed to allow
access.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
CCIEin2006
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:36 PM
To: bud selig
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Switch Network Design Question
Check out this link on VLAN hopping:
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,290660,sid14_gci1122494,0
0
.html
On 11/2/05, bud selig <bud4bud@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the responses on this. They were very helpful.
>
>
> On 11/2/05, bud selig <bud4bud@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering what everyone's thoughts were on having a single
> > switch house the outside, inside, DMZ VLANs. I prefer to keep the
> > inside VLAN
> on a
> > different physical switch for a more secure environment.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:05 GMT-3