From: Vincent Mashburn (vmashburn@fedex.com)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 11:07:49 GMT-3
You are correct here. There is no need to fragment voice packets. They
are already packaged into small packets. Fragmenting them further would
only add unnecessary delay.
Vince Mashburn
Engineer
901-263-5072
CCIE (R&S Written), CCNP, CCDA, Network +
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Schulz, Dave
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:05 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Frame-Relay fragmentation
I was working through the doc CD, where it stated something about the
FRF.12 inherently allows all voice traffic to pass-through unfragmented,
while fragmenting the data packets to the specific length. So, can I
assume that if a lab states to fragment all packets above 53 bytes (the
default), and allow voice to be unfragmented....then you may simply
configure "frame-relay fragment" command under the specific frame
map-class or interface, along with the frame-relay traffic-shaping
interface command?
I almost want to believe that priority queuing is needed, but am
confused on which way to go here (sometimes we make things more
complicated then they really are). Thoughts?
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com <mailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:04 GMT-3