From: tj.mitchell@verizon.net
Date: Mon Oct 31 2005 - 14:48:23 GMT-3
>From: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Date: Mon Oct 31 10:51:26 CST 2005
>To: tj.mitchell@verizon.net
>Subject: Please confirm (conf#e6a584f240223cdeb2891c1f0c721ba0)
>Hi,
>
>You have tried to post to a GroupStudy.com certification mailing list. Because
>the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required
>to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
>spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
>Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
>
>PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
>YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
>
>By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
>
>1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
>2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
>3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
>4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
>5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
>6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
>To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
>confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
>
>Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
>
>First time posters to GroupStudy.com are required to agree to the GroupStudy terms and conditions.
>Replying to this email, certifies you have read and agree to the GroupStudy posting guidelines and terms and conditions.
>
>--- Original Message Follows ---
>
>Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:51:18 -0600 (CST)
>From: <tj.mitchell@verizon.net>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
>Guys ?
>
>I took the lab on Friday, got my results and didn?t pass but I?m doing a re-read of the test. My question is this, you practice and practice everything you can think of, you do the practice exams and do really well on those in the 90 ? 95% range, then come test time you get subjects that you know like the back of your hand and have configured time and time again in labs and real life. You configure the tasks the way they ask, you get the results and the section is marked extremely low. I don?t understand what I did wrong, I configured the devices as the requirements have asked and I still get the sections wrong. Everything works according to the show commands, nothing is failing and I still get the sections wrong. Now from what I understand on certain sections there are multiple ways of configuring the devices to get the required result, but other sections you need to configure the section and they tell you how to configure it. If you configure the device and it meets the r!
e!
> quirement doesn?t violate the rules it should be valid, even though it might not be the desired configuration they are looking for it should still be right, right?
>
>Scott I have heard about you but never talked with you before, does any of this make sense to you? I know you teach a course and might have a little in-site that will help.
>
>If anyone might have a suggestion I'm open to it, I have taken the test more times that I would like to state, but I would like to finish off my certification and call it done. (basically I don't give up easily, other people can pass it, so can I :) )
>
>Thanks for all the help you have provided in the past.
>
>T.J. Mitchell
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3