From: JP (jenseike@start.no)
Date: Mon Oct 31 2005 - 13:25:49 GMT-3
Hi all...
There was a typo, and it has been cleared... They where asking for range 32
to 64, so problem solved
jp
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: CCIE KH49279 [mailto:ccie_lab@inetiq.com]
Sendt: 31. oktober 2005 17:21
Til: 'Hogo, Trust'; 'kevin gannon'; 'JP'
Kopi: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Emne: RE: summary routes
Ditto. If you were doing a lab and there is a hard requirement to have one
and only one summary route for the entire range, well you know your answer
then. But as long as you know the pros/cons of your options then the only
thing you need to do is seek clarity on the requirement.
wd
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hogo, Trust
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:24 AM
To: kevin gannon; JP
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: summary routes
How is the question phrased? Can you tell what the question really says?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
kevin gannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:25 AM
To: JP
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: summary routes
201.32.0.0 255.240.0.0 would give you 16 addresses .32 to .48 how about
255.224.0.0 which would give you the .32 to .64 ?
It would be close but I dont think you will get a single summary that will
do 31-65.
Regards
Kevin
On 10/31/05, JP <jenseike@start.no> wrote:
> Hi group
>
>
>
> I am trying to summarize in to ospf the range 201.X.1.0 ( X=31-65)
range
> with one summarize command. will this be possible.
>
>
>
> I am trying summary-address 201.32.0.0 255.240.0.0, but seems to
recive more
> routes than one..
>
>
>
> What will the right summary command be
>
>
>
>
>
> JP
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3