RE: ipv6

From: Chula Bandara (chula_bandara@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 31 2005 - 12:44:11 GMT-3

Next message: Hash Aminu: "ccie checklist link"
Previous message: Vincent Mashburn: "RE: 3550 QoS> Policing configs"
Maybe in reply to: Chula Bandara: "ipv6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks All for your replies. Thanks Simon , you covered the whole question.
It seems i need to think laterally not only in reading Lab questions but
also when trying to interpret the blueprint.
Simon congradulations for your achivement , it seems you don't want to take
a break!

Chula.

<BLOCKQUOTE style='PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #A0C6E5
2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px'><hr color=#A0C6E5
size=1>
From: "simon hart" <simon@harttel.com> To:
"Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com>,"Dave Temkin
"
<dave@ordinaryworld.com>,<nobody@groupstudy.com>,"Victor
Cappuccio " <cvictor@protokolgroup.com> CC: "Bajo
" <bajoalex@gmail.com>,"Chula Bandara "
<chula_bandara@hotmail.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject:
RE: ipv6 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:27:30 -0000 >I
would suggest that you make yourself familiar with IPv6 QOS, NAT-PT
and >tunneling. I am not saying these will necessarily be on the lab,
but I am >sure they can come up. > >Just because the
blueprint does not have a section on IPv6 QOS or IPv6 >NAT-PT
explicitly does not mean a thing. > >When you read the
blueprint, I would treat it as a general topic. The >blueprint says
QOS - not IPv4 QOS. The blueprint mentions GRE, mmm, that is >Generic
Routing Encapsulation - which means you can use it for
almost >anything (not just IPv4). > >When there is an
expectation of full reachability you need to know all your >options,
this includes IPv4 and IPv6 - so NAT-PT, ISATAP, 6to4 I would say >are
all fair game. So I would do yourselves a favour and at
least >familiarise yourselves with these topics, find where they are
on the DocCd >and configure them at least a few times in order to
understand where the >pitfalls are. > >Prior to my last
attempt, I think I tried and covered every IPv6 scenario I >could make
up from the command set / configuration guide on the DocCd. I >really
think this put me in good stead for the IPv6 section of the lab.
Not >even 5% of the IPv6 stuff I learned was covered in the lab, but
it made that >little 5% heck of a lot
easier. > >HTH > >Simon > >-----Original
Message----- >From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of >Schulz, Dave >Sent:
30 October 2005 23:27 >To: Dave Temkin ; nobody@groupstudy.com; Victor
Cappuccio >Cc: Bajo ; Chula Bandara ;
ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject: RE:
ipv6 > > >Agreed. I had heard this same thing from one of
the proctors...expect more >core technologies, not necessarily more
IPv6. > > >Dave > >-----Original
Message----- >From: nobody@groupstudy.com >To: Victor
Cappuccio >Cc: Bajo; Chula Bandara;
ccielab@groupstudy.com >Sent: 10/30/2005 12:16 PM >Subject: Re:
ipv6 > >In talking with the proctor before the lab, we inquired
about the >changes >coming in January. He said to expect other
features to be added (IOS >features in 12.3/4, etc.. to make up the
lost points) and that they >wouldn't >necessarily beef up IPv6
past where it is today because they don't see >the demand for
it. > > > >On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Victor Cappuccio
wrote: > > > That Fair Game Stuff Sounds Great, so they could
have something to >make you > > think a while, and know where
to find stuff in the Doc CD. But what >about > > today's Lab
what's the likelihood you get questions outside
the >blueprint. > > (not next year Lab?) > > >
> Nice Question Chula! > > > > > > -----
Original Message ----- > > From: "Bajo"
<bajoalex@gmail.com> > > To: "Chula Bandara"
<chula_bandara@hotmail.com> > > Cc:
<ccielab@groupstudy.com> > > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005
7:06 PM > > Subject: Re: ipv6 > > > > >
> > Hi Chula, > > > Without breaking NDA and given ISDN,
ATM, etc are removed, you >should > > > expect more of
IPv6. Anything is a fair game. > > > > > > On
10/28/05, Chula Bandara <chula_bandara@hotmail.com> wrote: >
> > > > > > > Hi all i am going through the archives
for couple of weeks now. i >have > > > > seen >
> > > IPv6 QOS , IPv6 NAT-PT > > > > questions being
discussed. > > > > > > > > I see IPV6 only
under IGP and BGP sections of the R&S blueprint. ( >not >
> > > under > > > > QOS or IP IOS features) >
> > > whats the likelyhood you get questions outside the
blueprint. > > > > > > > > Thanks > >
> > > > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________ >
> > > Subscription information may be found at: > > >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > >
Bajo > > > > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________ >
> > Subscription information may be found at: > > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________ >
> Subscription information may be found at: > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>> >_______________________________________________________________________ >Subscription
information may be found
at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>> >_______________________________________________________________________ >Subscription
information may be found
at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>>-- >No
virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free
Edition. >Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release
Date: 28/10/2005 > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing
message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.361 / Virus
Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date:
28/10/2005 > </BLOCKQUOTE>

Next message: Hash Aminu: "ccie checklist link"
Previous message: Vincent Mashburn: "RE: 3550 QoS> Policing configs"
Maybe in reply to: Chula Bandara: "ipv6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3