RE: Mutual Redistribution

From: El ayachi HADEK (elayachi.hadek@marocconnect.com)
Date: Mon Oct 31 2005 - 07:51:59 GMT-3


This dosn't resolve the problem I've already tried it:

R7:

router isis
 redistribute ospf 1 match internal external 1 external 2
 net 00.0000.0000.0000.00
 is-type level-2-only
!

R8:

R8#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
area
       * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
       P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

     200.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 200.0.0.8 is directly connected, Loopback0
i L2 200.0.0.7 [115/10] via 150.50.5.68, Serial0/0
     150.50.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks
C 150.50.4.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
i L2 150.50.7.0/25 [115/10] via 150.50.5.68, Serial0/0
C 150.50.5.64/27 is directly connected, Serial0/0

-----Message d'origine-----
De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
Leigh Harrison
Envoyi : Monday, October 31, 2005 10:20 AM
@ : El ayachi HADEK
Cc : HM C; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Objet : Re: Mutual Redistribution

After you type in "redistribute ospf 1" do a question mark.

There is options about which types ospf routes to redistribute, ie,.
which lsa's.

If you want to shove them all in, try " redist ospf 1 int ex1 ex 2"

LH

El ayachi HADEK wrote:

>This seem to be the one of my problems with mutual redistribution, this is
>related to ospf and other protocols:
>
>this is the senario: configuration of routers, some captures and questions.
>
>
>
>R5------------R7-------------R8
> FastEth Serialppp
> OSPF ISIS
>
>
>
>R7:
>
>
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 200.0.0.7 255.255.255.255
>interface Loopback111
> ip address 111.111.111.1 255.255.255.0
>
>interface FastEthernet1/0
> ip address 150.50.7.7 255.255.255.128
> duplex auto
> speed auto
>
>interface Serial0/0
> ip address 150.50.5.68 255.255.255.224
> ip router isis
>!
>router ospf 1
> router-id 200.0.0.7
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute connected subnets route-map test
> redistribute isis level-2 subnets
> network 150.50.7.7 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 200.0.0.7 0.0.0.0 area 0
>!
>router isis
> redistribute ospf 1
> net 00.0000.0000.0000.00
> is-type level-2-only
>!
>
>R5:
>
>interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 150.50.7.5 255.255.255.128
> duplex auto
> speed auto
>!
>
>router ospf 1
> router-id 200.0.0.5
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 150.50.7.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
>!
>
>R8:
>
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 200.0.0.8 255.255.255.255
>!
>!
>interface Serial0/0
> ip address 150.50.5.69 255.255.255.224
> ip router isis
> no fair-queue
>!
>router isis
> net 00.0000.0000.0008.00
> is-type level-2-only
>
>R8#show ip route
>Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
>area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
>Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 200.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
>C 200.0.0.8 is directly connected, Loopback0
>i L2 200.0.0.7 [115/10] via 150.50.5.68, Serial0/0
> 150.50.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks
>C 150.50.4.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
>i L2 150.50.7.0/25 [115/10] via 150.50.5.68, Serial0/0
>C 150.50.5.64/27 is directly connected, Serial0/0
>
>
>Where is 111.111.111.0 route witch was redistributed from connected to ospf
>and then from ospf to isis?
>
>
>R5#show ip route
>Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
>area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
>Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 200.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>O 200.0.0.7 [110/2] via 150.50.7.7, 19:48:34, FastEthernet0/0
> 111.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>O E2 111.111.111.0 [110/20] via 150.50.7.7, 19:45:08, FastEthernet0/0
> 150.50.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>C 150.50.7.0/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
>C 150.50.100.0/27 is directly connected, Serial0/0
>
>R7#show ip ospf database external
>
> OSPF Router with ID (200.0.0.7) (Process ID 1)
>
> Type-5 AS External Link States
>
> LS age: 805
> Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
> LS Type: AS External Link
> Link State ID: 111.111.111.0 (External Network Number )
> Advertising Router: 200.0.0.7
> LS Seq Number: 80000024
> Checksum: 0xBCA2
> Length: 36
> Network Mask: /24
> Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
> TOS: 0
> Metric: 20
> Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
> External Route Tag: 0
>
>R7#
>
>
>2- Where is 150.50.5.64/27 khown by isis and redistributed to ospf?
>
>
>
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]De la part de
>HM C
>Envoye : Monday, October 31, 2005 9:30 AM
>A : ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Objet : Mutual Redistribution
>
>
>I am testing out mutual redistribution on the same router other than ISIS
>protocol. I realise that directly connected network particpating
>in some routing protocol for eg RIP is not being redistributed to OSPF.
>And sometimes this is vice versa. I use the same IOS on all routers. I
>notices in some CCIE workbook they actually redistribute connected
>networks as the model answer when doing mutual redistribution. We all
>know the "problem" of ISIS in this scenario but this is happening to
>other protocols as well. Have you guys encountered these?
>
>P P.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3