From: Dave Temkin (dave@ordinaryworld.com)
Date: Sun Oct 30 2005 - 14:13:23 GMT-3
The goal is full reachability, however, this is generally not the case
with EGP's. Every lab will be different - however, you will be given
explicit instructions as to what to do in the lab. The lab is not an
excercise in creativity as someone else mentioned, it's an exercise in
interpreting and following instructions (and knowing how to make these
things all work together).
-Dave
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Ralph wrote:
> I thought the goal of the Lab is to ensure full reachability to all routes. Is BGP exempt from that goal? If the question is not very clear in this particular situation, without any specific instruction on what to do or not, and the Proctors not willing to give a direct answer, what do we do?
>
> TIA and regards
> Ralph.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Ralph" <Mandela@myrealbox.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:58:53 -0500
> Subject: BGP question #1
>
> Is it considered "best practice" to advertise a summary of my whole network to the Backbones to ensure full reachability to all BGP routes; even if we are not asked to or if the question is not specific about this.
>
> Is this a question for the Proctors?
>
> Would someone lose points for doing this or for NOT doing this?
>
> What is the prevailing opinion here?
>
> TIA and regards
> Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3