From: kevin gannon (kevin@gannons.net)
Date: Sun Oct 30 2005 - 14:07:07 GMT-3
In my experience if they wont give you an answer either
a) you are asking them how to do it
b) the answer is already in the paper. Once they did
help me out when I couldnt get EIGRP to a backbone
router. Felt stupid when the guy point to the diagram
and I realised I was trying on the wrong router !.
Usually its clear about reachability exclusions. Always
ask if the answer is not helpful read the exam again.
Regards
Kevin
On 10/30/05, Ralph <Mandela@myrealbox.com> wrote:
> I thought the goal of the Lab is to ensure full reachability to all routes. Is BGP exempt from that goal? If the question is not very clear in this particular situation, without any specific instruction on what to do or not, and the Proctors not willing to give a direct answer, what do we do?
>
> TIA and regards
> Ralph.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Ralph" <Mandela@myrealbox.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:58:53 -0500
> Subject: BGP question #1
>
> Is it considered "best practice" to advertise a summary of my whole network to the Backbones to ensure full reachability to all BGP routes; even if we are not asked to or if the question is not specific about this.
>
> Is this a question for the Proctors?
>
> Would someone lose points for doing this or for NOT doing this?
>
> What is the prevailing opinion here?
>
> TIA and regards
> Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3