From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Fri Oct 28 2005 - 20:18:30 GMT-3
That Fair Game Stuff Sounds Great, so they could have something to make you
think a while, and know where to find stuff in the Doc CD. But what about
today's Lab what's the likelihood you get questions outside the blueprint.
(not next year Lab?)
Nice Question Chula!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bajo" <bajoalex@gmail.com>
To: "Chula Bandara" <chula_bandara@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: ipv6
> Hi Chula,
> Without breaking NDA and given ISDN, ATM, etc are removed, you should
> expect more of IPv6. Anything is a fair game.
>
> On 10/28/05, Chula Bandara <chula_bandara@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all i am going through the archives for couple of weeks now. i have
> > seen
> > IPv6 QOS , IPv6 NAT-PT
> > questions being discussed.
> >
> > I see IPV6 only under IGP and BGP sections of the R&S blueprint. ( not
> > under
> > QOS or IP IOS features)
> > whats the likelyhood you get questions outside the blueprint.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bajo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3