From: Edwards, Andrew M (andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com)
Date: Thu Oct 27 2005 - 14:00:27 GMT-3
I cant speak to the disabling cef option as it was not my suggestion.
Plus, I cant imagine that the lab would give you a "known bug" and make
you work around it either.
If you lab this up you will see that your OSPF metrics are way out of
wack with PPPoFrame adjacent routers (IOW, cost is greater than 65535).
Thus they do not get advertised to other adjacent routers because the
prefixes are unreachable.
HTH
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Nawaz, Ajaz [mailto:Ajaz.Nawaz@bskyb.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:26 AM
To: Edwards, Andrew M; Niche; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: PPP over frame-relay issue
Andy
This doesn't explain why when disabling cef whether globally or on
per-interface basis - connectivity through the router is resumed?
It's a verified cef bug - I do not have the csc id to hand.
Hth
Ajaz Nawaz
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Edwards, Andrew M
Sent: 24 October 2005 18:01
To: Niche; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: PPP over frame-relay issue
Jacky,
I suggest you look at why PPPoFrame is not giving you the routes first.
You do not need to disable cef.
Look at the OSPF adjacencies, interfaces, and costs. See if you can
tweak these to get the adjacency to come up.
andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Niche [mailto:jackyliu419@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:42 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: PPP over frame-relay issue
Hi guys,
Would anyone know the reason why sometime you have to turn off "ip cef"
in order to get ppp over frame-relay to work? Is that a ios bug or kinda
hidden requirement?
I am worrying because what else we can do if the lab request me to do
QoS (which usually need to turn on "ip cef") on that particular router.
Cheers~
Jacky
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:54 GMT-3