From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Thu Oct 27 2005 - 00:05:54 GMT-3
Hello,
But I'm receiving the routes, now I know after thinking real hard in the
Why of the IE lab Wording, I understand that my solution is not bad, but
if I have any other trusted neighbors that I should receive routes, I'm
going to have an administrative pain in a growing organization.
Rack1R6#show ip route eigrp
D 200.0.0.0/24 [90/5620069] via 54.1.6.254, 01:39:12, Serial0/0
191.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 15 subnets, 3 masks
D 191.1.4.0/24 [90/867251276] via 191.1.46.4, 01:07:29, Tunnel0
D 191.1.0.0/16 is a summary, 01:07:33, Null0
54.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
D 54.0.0.0/8 is a summary, 01:07:33, Null0
D 200.0.1.0/24 [90/5620069] via 54.1.6.254, 01:39:12, Serial0/0
D 200.0.2.0/24 [90/5620069] via 54.1.6.254, 01:39:12, Serial0/0
D 200.0.3.0/24 [90/5620069] via 54.1.6.254, 01:39:12, Serial0/0
Rack1R6#show ip eigrp neighbors
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 10
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q
Seq Type
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
1 191.1.46.4 Tu0 12 01:07:42 144 5000 0
10 ****************************** TRUSTED NEIGHBOR..
0 54.1.6.254 Se0/0 13 01:39:24 32 200 0
5
Rack1R6#show run | b eigrp 10
router eigrp 10
network 54.0.0.0
network 191.1.46.0 0.0.0.255
metric weights 0 3 1 1 1 0
auto-summary
Scott Morris wrote:
>IMHO, the key would be "accept any packets". In your method, you aren't
>accepting any ROUTES, but you do have an EIGRP neighbor relationship and
>therefore are getting packets.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Victor Cappuccio
>Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:18 PM
>To: Cisco certification
>Subject: is this acceptable?
>
>Hello All,
>
>If I have a EIGRP neighbor relationship between 2 Routers in a NBMA Network
>in AS 10, and the wording indicates that In order to prevent routing issues
>over this Network, ensure that R1 does not accept any EIGRP packets on the
>NBMA Interface
>
>Ok the topology is like this
>
>R1 --| NBMA |-- R2
>
>I think that a valid solution could be:
>
>Rack1R1#show run | be router eigrp
>router eigrp 10
>network 54.0.0.0
>metric weights 0 3 1 1 1 0
>distance 90 54.1.6.254 0.0.0.0
>! Where 54.1.6.254 is Router 2
>distance 255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
>! Deny every thing to be installed in the Rtable.
>no auto-summary
>
>The solution that appers in the WB (IE Lab 5 Tasks 5.23-5.25.-I'm not saying
>that is wrong)
>
>access-list 102 permit eigrp host 54.1.6.254 any access-list 102 deny eigrp
>any any access-list 102 permit ip any any log
>
>interface Serial0/0
>ip address 54.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
>ip access-group 102 in
>
>So my question now if the First method is acceptable?
>Regards
>Victor.
>
>--
>Victor Cappuccio
>cvictor@protokolgroup.com
>.O.
>..O
>OOO
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
-- Victor Cappuccio cvictor@protokolgroup.com .O. ..O OOO
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:54 GMT-3