RE: is this acceptable?

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Wed Oct 26 2005 - 21:49:04 GMT-3


Y'all are amusing...

You are still "accepting packets" at this point. I'd have to look at the
design of the whole lab to further discuss the idea of 'why' you may want to
do that or not, but just based on wording I would look at the solution given
and say you aren't supposed to have a neighbor there.

Perhaps the Brians' will chime in. it's their lab! ;)

Scott

  _____

From: Niche [mailto:jackyliu419@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:46 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Victor Cappuccio; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: is this acceptable?

Hi guys,

Just wanna ask Scott if I use "distribute-list gateway" is another acception
solution to this question.

Cheers~
Jacky

On 10/27/05, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:

IMHO, the key would be "accept any packets". In your method, you aren't
accepting any ROUTES, but you do have an EIGRP neighbor relationship and
therefore are getting packets.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:18 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: is this acceptable?

Hello All,

If I have a EIGRP neighbor relationship between 2 Routers in a NBMA Network
in AS 10, and the wording indicates that In order to prevent routing issues

over this Network, ensure that R1 does not accept any EIGRP packets on the
NBMA Interface

Ok the topology is like this

R1 --| NBMA |-- R2

I think that a valid solution could be:

Rack1R1#show run | be router eigrp
router eigrp 10
network 54.0.0.0
metric weights 0 3 1 1 1 0
distance 90 54.1.6.254 0.0.0.0
! Where 54.1.6.254 is Router 2
distance 255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
! Deny every thing to be installed in the Rtable.
no auto-summary

The solution that appers in the WB (IE Lab 5 Tasks 5.23-5.25.-I'm not saying
that is wrong)

access-list 102 permit eigrp host 54.1.6.254 any access-list 102 deny eigrp
any any access-list 102 permit ip any any log

interface Serial0/0
ip address 54.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
ip access-group 102 in

So my question now if the First method is acceptable?
Regards
Victor.

--
Victor Cappuccio
cvictor@protokolgroup.com
.O.
..O
OOO


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:54 GMT-3