Different Command Format on BGP routing process

From: The Great Ryan (pv.ryan@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 26 2005 - 09:19:35 GMT-3

Hi Group,

There is any different result if I use the following to enable BGP ?

Router(config)# router bgp 65412
Router(config-router)# neighbor 192.168.0.1 remote-as 65412
Router(config-router)# neighbor 192.168.0.1 ebgp-multihop 255

Router(config)# router bgp 65412
Router(config-router)# neighbor 192.168.0.1 remote-as 65412
Router(config-router)# address-family ipv4
Router(config-router-af)# neighbor 192.168.0.1 activate
Router(config-router-af)# neighbor 192.168.0.1 ebgp-multihop 255

I found something very interesting. the command "neighbor 192.168.0.1
next-hop-unchanged" will never display in the first format but it
takes effect when I use some show command. I'm afraid that if I write
erase the configuration and paste the configuration again, it will
miss this command. Any have this experience before ?

Thanks !
Ryan

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:54 GMT-3