RE: Comparing HSRP and VRRP

From: Henk de Tombe (henk.de.tombe@qi.nl)
Date: Mon Oct 24 2005 - 06:02:49 GMT-3


Hi,

You can shutdown a VRRP group while retaining the configuration, with HSRP
this is not possible.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/hiap_c
/ch20/haipvrrp.htm#wp1053826

Regards,
Henk

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Namens Chris Lewis
Verzonden: zondag 23 oktober 2005 21:17
Aan: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Onderwerp: Comparing HSRP and VRRP

Hi,
 
Just looking for opinions and input.
 
Comparing HSRP and VRRP, I conclude:
 
VRRP has preempt on by default, therefore does not need it configured like
HSRP does.
HSRP can use enhanced object tracking
(to track more than just line protocol up/down as follows) track 100
interface serial1/0 ip routing interface Ethernet0/0 standby 1 track 100
decrement 10 I do not see a command option for VRRP to use track, even
though the enhanced object tracking documentation suggets there is. So I
conclude VRRP cannot track the status of one of its interfaces like HSRP
can.
To load balance between routers, HSRP and VRRP can have different groups to
prefer different routers, but anything more sophisticated required GLBP Any
comments or other differentiators?

Chris

                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:52 GMT-3