From: Leigh Harrison (ccileigh@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 18 2005 - 14:38:27 GMT-3
Fellas,
Thanks for your responses.
Oddly enough - I know that that's what the bandwidth command does under
the interface.
I think it's time to knock off for the day!!
LH
jeff.s.golia@verizon.com wrote:
>
> Leigh,
>
> Your second example only sets the bandwidth on the interface for
> calculation by routing protocols. It has no effect on how much
> traffic passes. Also it is set in kbps, so if running eigrp it will
> calculate cost based on a 5000000000bps (5GBps) link.
>
> Try RATE-LIMIT command as your alternative to MQC
>
> (CAR)
>
> HTH
>
> *******************************************
> Jeffrey Golia
> CCIE#14849
> Tac Engineer (Converged Technology Services)
> Verizon Enterprise Premise Solutions
> Tel # 1-800-993-2264
> email : Jeff.S.Golia@Verizon.com
> *******************************************
>
>
>
> *"Leigh Harrison" <ccileigh@gmail.com>*
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
> 10/18/2005 01:15 PM
> Please respond to "Leigh Harrison"
>
>
> To: "FORUM" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc:
> Subject: Limiting bandwidth on an interface
>
>
>
>
> All,
>
> When asked to configure an interface so that only 5meg is allocated for
> all traffic would it be better to do this:-
>
> class-map ALLtraffic
> match any
> policy-map anything5MEG
> class ALLtraffic
> police 5000000
> interface f0/0
> service-policy input anything5MEG
> service-policy output anything5MEG
>
> Or should I opt for the more simple:-
>
> interface f0/0
> bandwidth 5000000
>
> Both would have the desired squeezing effect.
>
> Comments ?
>
> LH
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3