From: manoj menon (manojmenon123@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Oct 16 2005 - 18:03:27 GMT-3
If you managed to build the Tunnel and extend the Area 0 on to R3, then you just have to authenticate the tunnel interfaces just like you do for a normal OSPF-turned on physical interface -
Note: if you have turned on authentication using 'area 0 authentication ..'command on R1 and R2, do that on R3 as well. If its on interface-level - you can do it on tunnel interface at both ends. The point to note is, the tunnel ip address or the ip address the 'ip numbered' on the tunnel points to, should belong to area 0 - a clear extension of AREA 0.
Regards,
Manoj
stephen skinner <stephenski@gmail.com> wrote:
guys ,
here`s my senario ,
R1======R2=======R3
area0 area0 area1 area1 area 2
r1 r2 in 0 r2 and r3 in area 1 r3 also has area 2
ok i need a virtual link , but i cant use virtual link command i will use a
tunnel .ok
problem is 0 is authenticated ,
do in need to run auth on the tunnel ??
i think i would yes
if i was using the virtual link command i would just add the auth to the
end of it , BUT i wouldnt put auth on the area 1 interface ..
but i would for the tunnel
what do you think guys
TIA
steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3