Re: QOS LLQ question

From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 16 2005 - 17:43:49 GMT-3


Priority is dequeued first up to the amount specified but not over, after
that it's dropped. Correct me if I'm wrong here.....

jl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Leigh Harrison" <ccileigh@gmail.com>
To: "amir cohen" <avi_patish@yahoo.com>
Cc: "FORUM" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: QOS LLQ question

> Hey Amir,
>
> Priority will always have the bandwidth that it needs and "bandwidth" is
> more of a best effort.
>
> The way I see it is that you can put in loads of "bandwidth" statement,
> oversubscribe and it will fight it out - Priority will get given the
> bandwidthe over things with the "bandwidth" statement.
>
> I think "priority" is put into the priority hardwasr queue (although I'm
> not too sure)
>
> I use priority for voice traffic and that is more important than my other
> data traffic to which I assign chunks of bandwidth.
>
> LH
>
> amir cohen wrote:
>
>>Guys,
>>
>>I'm a little confuse waht is th ediffrent between
>>Priority and Bandwidth in a MQC ???
>>When do i need to put priority???
>>
>>
>>
>>Amir
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1
>> million songs. Try it free.
>>http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3