TTL on RIP updates

From: Tim (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Oct 16 2005 - 17:23:59 GMT-3

Next message: stephen skinner: "opsf area 0 authentication over tunnel"
Previous message: amir cohen: "QOS LLQ question"
Next in thread: Ian Stong: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Ian Stong: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Chris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Ed Lui: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Feldman, Jim: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: DP: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,

I seem to recall that the TTL for rip updates is 2.

Is that true only if the neighbor command is used? Or if the default dest
address is 224.0.0.9? Or, never?

TIA, Tim

Next message: stephen skinner: "opsf area 0 authentication over tunnel"
Previous message: amir cohen: "QOS LLQ question"
Next in thread: Ian Stong: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Ian Stong: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Chris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Jongsoo: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Ed Lui: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: Feldman, Jim: "RE: TTL on RIP updates"
Maybe reply: DP: "Re: TTL on RIP updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3