From: Dave Mumford (Dave.Mumford@telindus.co.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 15 2005 - 05:24:53 GMT-3
Hi Carl,
As far as I can see trouble with that is you can't tie down specific external routes with the distance ospf external 171 command, therefore I'll be in the same situation where external routes in ospf other than the eigrp redistributed routes , will appear more attractive via eigrp when we redistribute these into eigrp....
Or maybe I'm missing something ?
Thanks,
Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Willias [mailto:mandingo2073@yahoo.com]
Sent: 15 October 2005 03:22
To: Dave Mumford; Chris Lewis; Cciegroupstudy (E-mail)
Subject: Re: distance command in eigrp
Dave how about the other way around. Raise the ospf routes to 171 then Eigrp External routes would be preferred.
CW
----- Original Message ----
From: Dave Mumford <Dave.Mumford@telindus.co.uk>
To: Chris Lewis <chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com>; Cciegroupstudy (E-mail) <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 14:29:08
Subject: RE: distance command in eigrp
Thanks Chris,
I suspect your right, looks like I'll have to filter the routes coming
back into eigrp from ospf.
Regards,
Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Lewis [mailto:chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com]
Sent: 14 October 2005 20:19
To: Dave Mumford; Cciegroupstudy (E-mail)
Subject: Re: distance command in eigrp
Last I looked, one could not change the AD of specific EIGRP external
routes. I believe it is the way the protocol works, or more
specifically, the way the programmer coded it :)
Chris
Dave Mumford <Dave.Mumford@telindus.co.uk> wrote:
Just getting back into ccie study after a year long lay off and having
problems with mutual redistribution points.
I am redistributing between 2 routers running eigrp and ospf. I am
receiving
external eigrp routes from within the eigrp a/s and redistributing these
out
at the 2 routers into ospf, this ofcourse causes a loop situation as the
eigrp
external routes appear more attractive via ospf. I've modified the
distance in
eigrp for these particular external eigrp routes tied down by an
access-list:
!
router eigrp 100
Distance 109 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 10
!
Access-list 10 permit 150.1.6.0 0.0.0.255
!
for some reason the AD is not changed for this route, this works fine
for
internal routes ?
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Dave.
This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the intended
recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by telephone and
confirm
that it has been deleted from your system and any copies destroyed. If
you
are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using,
printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or any
information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavours to virus scan
all
e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that this e-mail
and any
attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus
checking.
The right to monitor e-mail communications through our network is
reserved by
us.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3