From: Edwards, Andrew M (andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com)
Date: Fri Oct 14 2005 - 20:10:45 GMT-3
Raj,
Look at your primary peer configuration on R6 versus R5.
This should show you why you have 2 connected DSLW peers on R4.
Or, put another way, do you want R6 to be promiscuous and passive or R5?
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Chacko, Raj [mailto:RChacko@DRAFTNET.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:51 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: DLSW question for a change
Hi,
I am trying to figure out why is that R4 establishes two connections
even though it is supposed to have a single connection. Any help would
be appreciated.
Here is my lame ascii art and the respected configs.
R4(s0.456)----------(s1)R5(e0)--
\ |
\ |---LAN
\ |
\______(s0)R6(e1)--
R4
dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.4.4
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.6.6
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.5.5 backup-peer 192.168.6.6
dlsw bridge-group 1
R5
dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.5.5
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.4.4
dlsw bridge-group 1
R6
dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.6.6 passive promis
dlsw bridge-group 1
Router4#sh dlsw peer
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
TCP 192.168.6.6 CONNECT 2 2 conf 0 0 0
00:00:23
TCP 192.168.5.5 CONNECT 2 2 conf 0 0 0
00:00:08
Total number of connected peers: 2
Total number of connections: 2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3