From: Chacko, Raj (RChacko@DRAFTNET.com)
Date: Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:11:28 GMT-3
Hello Victor,
It doesn't let me define a backup-peer without first defining it as a
remote-peer.
Router4(config)#dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.6.6 backup-peer 192.168.5.5
%Primary peer by ip address 192.168.5.5 does not exist
So, what do you think?
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:54 PM
To: Chacko, Raj
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Re: DLSW question for a change
Hello Raj, I just guessing here
Try using this one
R4
dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.4.4
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.6.6 backup-peer 192.168.5.5
dlsw bridge-group 1
Chacko, Raj wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to figure out why is that R4 establishes two connections even
>though it is supposed to have a single connection. Any help would be
>appreciated.
>
>Here is my lame ascii art and the respected configs.
>
>
>
>R4(s0.456)----------(s1)R5(e0)--
>
> \ |
>
> \ |---LAN
>
> \ |
>
> \______(s0)R6(e1)--
>
>
>
>R4
>
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.4.4
>
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.6.6
>
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.5.5 backup-peer 192.168.6.6
>
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>
>
>
>R5
>
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.5.5
>
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 192.168.4.4
>
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>
>
>
>R6
>
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 192.168.6.6 passive promis
>
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Router4#sh dlsw peer
>
>Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
>uptime
>
> TCP 192.168.6.6 CONNECT 2 2 conf 0 0 0
>00:00:23
>
> TCP 192.168.5.5 CONNECT 2 2 conf 0 0 0
>00:00:08
>
>Total number of connected peers: 2
>
>Total number of connections: 2
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3