From: Peter Van Oene (petvan@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 14 2005 - 09:53:14 GMT-3
Not doing circular redistribution works better imho ;-)
Of course, Cisco likes complex networks.
P
On 10/14/05, Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com <Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com> wrote:
>
> Who uses route tags as a good practice when doing circular redistribution?
> I just wonder if it would be worth it to take the time to
> do it to maybe save some trouble later?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
>
> ============================================
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
> to
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
> may
> contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is made
> on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this
> electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the
> preparation of this material as at this date, and are subject to change
> without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail
> and
> any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited.
>
> Please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of this message and any
> attachments from your system.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:51 GMT-3