From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Thu Oct 13 2005 - 03:40:49 GMT-3
OK, Thanks in advanced.. Any other comments
De Witt, Duane wrote:
> No, R2 will still be looking for something in it's own subnet as far
> as I know. I'll lab it up later and check, just busy with IEWB at the
> moment.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
> *Sent:* 13 October 2005 08:28 AM
> *To:* De Witt, Duane
> *Cc:* Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: Router with out any routing Protocol
>
>
>
> Hello Duane, Many Thanks for your replys, maybe I'm saying something
> stupid here, but R1 haves a 10.0.0.1 /8 as a secondary address..
> And by adding this I will cover all subnets, right?
>
> Thanks again
> Victor.
>
>
>
> De Witt, Duane wrote:
>
> R1 and R2 aren't in a common subnet, so I'm not sure what you are
> trying to achieve?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
> *Sent:* 13 October 2005 08:19 AM
> *To:* De Witt, Duane
> *Cc:* Cisco certification
> *Subject:* Re: Router with out any routing Protocol
>
>
>
> I wish to have a CCIE rack to play but for now, I just have a 3640
> gift from a good Friend... (I know that only with one router would
> not let me understand anything but it's cool to check weird
> configurations or command parameters / Do someone from the other side
> of the world (My time zone is GMT -4) have a rack that does not uses
> in the night and be so generous to share it? :-) )
>
> R1:
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 secondary
> ! Thats why I told about to create a secondary address - I did not
> finish the idea when I sent the email / I Think I'm getting Crazy with
> all this stuffs.. Sorry for that
> ip address 10.50.50.2 255.255.255.248
> speed 100
> full-duplex
>
> R2:
> interface FastEthernet4/0
> ip address 10.60.60.1 255.255.255.248
> ip mobile arp access-group 2
> duplex full
>
>
> access-list 2 permit 10.50.50.2
>
> De Witt, Duane wrote:
>
>I don't think this scenario would work. LAM would require R1 and R2
>
>ethernet to be in the same subnet, however it will allow users on R1
>
>ethernet to be on a subnet allocate somewhere else in the network.
>
>
>
>If R1 and R2 ethernet are in different subnets how will you get
>
>communication going between the two?
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com <mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>
>Victor Cappuccio
>
>Sent: 13 October 2005 07:50 AM
>
>Cc: Cisco certification
>
>Subject: Re: Router with out any routing Protocol
>
>
>
>Ok this one was easy, lets change the Scenario a little bit, using the
>
>same same topology, but now R1 is in a different Subnet than R2, so now
>
>we need to configure LAM on R2, and Redistributing the mobile into the
>
>ospf gives R3 the way to get to R1, but what about the return traffic R1
>
>
>
>-> R3?
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Victor.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>manoj menon wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>On R1#
>>
>>
>>
>>no ip routing
>>
>>!
>>
>>ip default-gateway <R2-E0-IP_ADD>
>>
>>!
>>
>>Either you can advertise the R1-R2 Ethernet subnet in OSPF, or
>>
>>redistribute, or static route back to R1, and redistribute static into
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>OSPF...
>>
>>
>>
>>Comments...
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Mnaoj
>>
>>
>>
>>*/Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com> <mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello People, consider this Scenario
>>
>>
>>
>> 10.1.1.0/24
>>
>> R1 --- Ethernet --- R2 | Network Cloud Running OSPF | R3.
>>
>> ---Vlan 50 ----
>>
>>
>>
>> You are not allowed to configure any routing protocol on R1, but
>>
>> one of
>>
>> the requirements is that R1 should be able to ping any ip address
>>
>> in R3,
>>
>> how would you accomplish this? I thought to create a secondary
>>
>> address
>>
>> in R1 with an IP Classful Address Mask (10.0.0.1/8) and complete
>>
>> the ARP
>>
>> Table for R3 physical interfaces with R2 Ethernet Mac Address
>>
>> (since R2
>>
>> knows the complete network).- I Think this could work Ok / Have
>>
>>
>>
>not
>
>
>
>> tested yet .. Can you see another was of accomplishing this task?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Victor.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>>Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
><http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yah <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http:/music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>
>
>_oo.com/unlimited/> <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http:/music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>_
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT-3