From: Chris Lewis (chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 15:13:03 GMT-3
R1
int e0/0
ip address 172.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 172.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip nat outside
ip nat inside source static 172.168.1.1 172.168.2.3
Worked for me
Imal kalutotage <imal.kalutotage@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Chris,
It sounds like you have to use NAT for this.
I tried to translate the source address (primary) to the seceondary address.
But still couldnot acheive the end result...
If you can post it, it will be helpful
Cheers,
imal
On 10/5/05, Chris Lewis <chrlewiscsco@yahoo.com> wrote: Yes.
Consider the following absolutes.
eigrp will always use the primary address on the interface to source hellos from, regardless of the whether you enable a network statement with the primary or secoindary address.
EIGRP neighbors cannot form unless they are on a common subnet.
Now, can you think of a way to have R1 send out packets with a source address on the 192.168.2.0 subnet, even if the routing process thinks it is sending out something on the 192.168.1.0 subnet, can the router intervene and change that address?
If you have problems, post an attempt at solving this.
Chris
Niche < jackyliu419@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
Is there any elegant way to accomplished this?
e.g.
R1
int e0
ip address 192.168.1.1
255.255.255.0
ip address 192.168.2.1
255.255.255.0secondary
R2
int e0
ip address 192.168.2.2
255.255.255.0
GRE seem problematic when redistribution come into the picture and also it
require to create new ip addresses.
Cheers~
Jacky
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3