IPExpert Lab 40 IGP Question.

From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 12:08:22 GMT-3

• Next message: Chris Lewis: "Re: eigrp neighbor - secondary ip address"
• Previous message: Victor Cappuccio: "Re: DLSW Switch redundancy ?"
• Next in thread: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: IPExpert Lab 40 IGP Question."
• Maybe reply: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: IPExpert Lab 40 IGP Question."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello All..

Looking specifically to IPExpert WB7 Lab 40, in the redistribution part
in R5

I know that we need to redistribute connected in EIGRP so we can get the
other interfaces that do not participate in RProtocols and in this
particular case is because the route still do not belongs to the ISIS RIB.
But my question is, why not redistributing the connected also in ISIS?
(Has this something to do, that because this is a BRI Interface??)

Also I think that the dialer-list permitting clns is missing (
also in R2 there are no filters for interesting traffic, Have not read
the ISDN part Yet, just finished the IGP Part =), so please excuse if
this is a dummy question)

Thoughts?
 
Thx
Victor.

router eigrp 100
 redistribute connected
 redistribute isis level-1-2 metric 1544 2000 255 1 1500

router isis
 redistribute eigrp 100

• Next message: Chris Lewis: "Re: eigrp neighbor - secondary ip address"
• Previous message: Victor Cappuccio: "Re: DLSW Switch redundancy ?"
• Next in thread: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: IPExpert Lab 40 IGP Question."
• Maybe reply: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: IPExpert Lab 40 IGP Question."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3