From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:49:45 GMT-3
Hello Jung, for example Lab 37 in W7..
One of the task says:
The routing Table of each device should have an optimized, redundant
and loop-free Topology..
I hear from here and there that the Lab would be a fair game.. So! It's
ok then to take your time to do it, it its specifically told to do it,
if not then go ahead
I never been in the lab, so I do not have the expertise of the proctor
to candidate relationship or the Wording solving must that needed for
the exam "Yet"
So this are my 2 cents
Victor.
Easyman wrote:
>Hi, Groups
>
>This question is referred to ipexpert workbook v7.0 lab 30 with in section
>IGP
>
>After finishing the IGP, I noticed several route sub optimization problem.
>for example:
>
>1. R7 will load balane the route to 172.30.25.0/24 through both R5 and R6.
>(It should prefer R5.)
>2. R2 will load balane the route to 172.30.69.0/30 through both R5 and R6.
>(It should prefer R6.)
>....
>I used some distance and offset-list command to solve these problems.
>Although, this lab didn't specifically mention dealing the route sub
>optimization problem.
>But how will the proctor view this issue?
>
>Solving route optimization problem cost lots of time for me.
>Because, I need to observe every routing entry on every router.
>
>Anynoe can share your experience about how to deal this issue in more
>efficient way.
>
>TIA.
>Regard.
>Easyman
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:49 GMT-3