RE: 3550 versus 3750

From: Tim (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Sep 24 2005 - 11:56:44 GMT-3

• Next message: joshua lauer: "Re: GS post on 3550 vs 3750"
• Previous message: Tim: "GS post on 3550 vs 3750"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim: "3550 versus 3750"
• Next in thread: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: 3550 versus 3750"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

James,

Thank you. I'll have to look into that.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: James Ventre [mailto:messageboard@ventrefamily.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 10:52 AM
To: Tim
Cc: 'Group Study'
Subject: Re: 3550 versus 3750

Major differences in QoS.

Just one is SRR support

Tim wrote:
> Besides this one additional feature, are there any other significant
> differences?

• Next message: joshua lauer: "Re: GS post on 3550 vs 3750"
• Previous message: Tim: "GS post on 3550 vs 3750"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim: "3550 versus 3750"
• Next in thread: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: 3550 versus 3750"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:16 GMT-3